An Auditor is a Watch Dog, not a BloodHound


An Auditor is a Watch Dog, not a BloodHound

"An Auditor is a Watchdog, not a BloodHound"

The statement "An auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound" encapsulates the role and responsibilities of an auditor in the context of financial audits and is often used to describe the auditor's level of scrutiny and responsibility. It suggests that auditors have a specific role in overseeing a company's financial reporting but are not expected to uncover every possible instance of fraud or misconduct. Let's break down the statement and explain the situation of an auditor:

Watchdog Role:

  1. Auditors primarily serve as watchdogs, which means they act as a safeguard to ensure that financial statements and records are prepared in accordance with relevant accounting standards and are free from material misstatements. They review and verify the information presented in the financial statements, providing a level of assurance to stakeholders that the company's financial position is accurately represented.

Verification and Validation:

  1. In their watchdog role, auditors verify the accuracy of financial data, assess internal controls, and examine accounting practices to ensure compliance with applicable accounting principles and regulations. They provide an independent and objective assessment of the company's financial health.

Reasonable Assurance:

  1. Auditors aim to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are reliable. This means they perform audit procedures that are designed to detect significant errors, misstatements, or irregularities, but they do not guarantee absolute accuracy.


The "not a bloodhound" part of the statement emphasizes that auditors have limitations. They are not expected to be investigative detectives or forensic accountants who uncover every instance of fraud or misconduct. Auditors rely on sampling and testing methods, and there may be fraud or errors that go undetected due to these limitations.

Reliance on Internal Controls:

  1. Auditors often rely on the company's internal controls and processes to identify and prevent fraud or misstatements. They assess the effectiveness of these controls but do not perform an exhaustive review of all transactions.


  1. While auditors may come across irregularities or issues during the audit, their role is to communicate these findings to the appropriate parties, such as the company's management, the audit committee, or regulatory authorities. It is then the responsibility of these parties to take appropriate action.

Professional Skepticism:

  1. Auditors are expected to approach their work with professional skepticism, meaning they maintain a critical and questioning mindset while conducting the audit. This skepticism helps them to identify potential risks and areas that may require additional scrutiny.

Legal and Ethical Obligations:

  1. Auditors have legal and ethical obligations to report any significant findings, irregularities, or suspected fraud to the appropriate authorities when required by law or professional standards.

In summary, the statement underscores that auditors play a vital role in ensuring the integrity and reliability of financial reporting, but they operate within a framework of reasonable assurance and specific audit procedures. They are not expected to uncover every possible wrongdoing but rather to provide an independent assessment of the company's financial statements, internal controls, and accounting practices. When auditors encounter suspicious activities or material misstatements, they have a duty to communicate their findings to relevant parties, but their primary role is to provide an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements.

Related Topics